🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials requests measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a pending law that include lowering the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulation among civil society groups.

Global industry interference concerns

It comes amid expanded apprehension about business sector influence with health policies. Recently, WHO officials raised concerns that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of business advocacy worldwide. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” said Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, the company recommends this be reduced to less than half “following international guideline limits”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the legislation is approved.

The WHO in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass 65% of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would lead smokers to “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The draft bill proposes sanctions for various offences “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the company executive of the African subsidiary says the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “supports the objectives of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but claims that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We live in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and gather the crop and market the products – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative commented: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with applicable local laws. Additionally, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, mentioning that young individuals should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for evolving legislation to accomplish desired public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, mentioning that the company's suggestions “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which involves increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.